Desafios enfrentados por enfermeiros da classificação de risco em urgência e emergência / Challenges faced by risk classification nurses in urgency and emergency / Desafíos enfrentados por enfermeros clasificadores de riesgo en urgencia y emergencia

Objetivo: analisar os desafios enfrentados por enfermeiros da classificação de risco de um serviço de urgência e emergência. Método: pesquisa exploratória e descritiva, com abordagem qualitativa. A coleta de dados ocorreu em março de 2019, por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas e individuais com enfermeiros atuantes em Unidade de Pronto Atendimento do município de Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brasil. Para a análise, utilizou-se a análise de conteúdo de Bardin. Resultados: foram geradas três categorias: assistência de enfermagem na classificação de risco; desafios do setor de classificação de risco; e desafios da ferramenta que define a classificação de risco. As participantes apontaram questões como falta de compreensão da população, protocolo defasado e discordância com outros membros da equipe como os principais desafios. Conclusão: verificou-se que a atuação da enfermagem na classificação de risco é um processo ainda complexo, que não depende estritamente de protocolos, mas de profissionais motivados, treinados continuamente e em sintonia.

Objective: to analyze the challenges faced by nurses in the risk classification of an urgency and emergency service. Method: exploratory and descriptive research, with a qualitative approach. Data collection took place in March 2019, through semi-structured and individual interviews with nurses working in an Emergency Care Unit in the city of Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil. For the analysis, Bardin's content analysis was used. Results: three categories were generated: nursing care in risk classification; challenges of the risk classification industry, and challenges of the tool that defines the risk classification. Participants pointed out issues such as lack of understanding of the population, outdated protocol and disagreement with other team members, as the main challenges. Conclusion: it was found that the role of nursing in risk classification is still a complex process, which does not strictly depend on protocols, but on motivated professionals, continuously trained and in tune.

Analysis of Barriers to Public and Private Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs in Patients with Low and High Adherence

ABSTRACT Introduction: Participants in cardiac rehabilitation programs have low adherence to their sessions, which makes extremely important to recognize the barriers that cause non-adherence, identifying whether the type of service and level of adherence influence these barriers. Methods: This is a cross-sectional observational study, in which 220 individuals (66.80±11.59 years) of both genders who are members of public and private exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs participated. The volunteers were divided according to the level of adherence, considering patients with low adherence (PLA) those with < 70% of attendance and high adherence (PHA) those with > 70%. Then, initial evaluation, Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale, analysis of socioeconomic level, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Mini-Mental State Examination were applied. Results: Higher total barriers were found in PLA in the public service compared to PHA in the private service (P=0.023). In the subscale "perceived need", PHA in the public service showed higher values than PLA and PHA in the private service (P≤0.001). The "access" barrier was higher for PHA in the public service when compared to PHA in the private service (P=0.024). PHA in the public service exhibited a higher barrier regarding questions about distance, transportation problems, cost, and time constraints. Conclusion: The public program presents higher barriers in the questions and categories compared to the private program, mainly the PHA. Furthermore, there are differences in the profile of the participants regarding socioeconomic and anxiety levels, treatment time, ethnicity, and city where they live.

Publicly versus privately funded cardiac rehabilitation: access and adherence barriers. A cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) barriers are well-understood in high-resource settings. However, they are under-studied in low-resource settings, where access is even poorer and the context is significantly different, including two-tiered healthcare systems and greater socioeconomic challenges. OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in characteristics of patients attending publicly versus privately funded CR and their barriers to adherence. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational, cross-sectional study in public and private CR programs offered in Brazil. METHODS: Patients who had been attending CR for ≥ 3 months were recruited from one publicly and one privately funded CR program. They completed assessments regarding sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and the CR Barriers Scale. RESULTS: From the public program, 74 patients were recruited, and from the private, 100. Participants in the public program had significantly lower educational attainment (P < 0.001) and lower socioeconomic status (P < 0.001). Participants in the private program had more cognitive impairment (P = 0.015), and in the public program more anxiety (P = 0.001) and depressive symptoms (P = 0.008) than their counterparts. Total barriers among public CR participants were significantly higher than those among private CR participants (1.34 ± 0.26 versus 1.23 ± 0.15/5]; P = 0.003), as were scores on 3 out of 5 subscales, namely: comorbidities/functional status (P = 0.027), perceived need (P < 0.001) and access (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Publicly funded programs need to be tailored to meet their patients' requirements, through consideration of educational and psychosocial matters, and be amenable to mitigation of patient barriers relating to presence of comorbidities and poorer health status.

Avaliação dos ruídos da articulação temporomandibular em crianças com bruxismo / Assessment of temporomandibular joint sounds in children with bruxism

OBJETIVO: avaliar se há relação entre bruxismo e presença de ruídos articulares em crianças. MÉTODOS: participaram do estudo 48 crianças entre 6 e 9 anos atendidas na Clínica Infantil da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Nove de Julho. Foram selecionadas 21 crianças com bruxismo e 27 crianças no grupo controle. Um único examinador previamente treinado e "cego" em relação aos grupos realizou exame de palpação manual e auscultação bilateral das Articulações Temporomandibulares com a utilização de estetoscópio, extra-auricular lateral e dorsal para a análise dos ruídos articulares, diferenciando-os em crepitação e estalidos. Foi realizado o número mínimo de 3 repetições nas mensurações dos ruídos para cada criança. Foram realizadas as análises descritivas de todas as variáveis e o teste qui-quadrado foi utilizado para avaliar a associação entre as variáveis, adotando-se um nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: em relação à presença de ruído 37,5% (n=18) apresentaram algum tipo de ruído articular, sendo que 72,2% (n=13) apresentaram estalido e 27,8% (n=5) apresentaram crepitação. Das 18 crianças que apresentaram algum tipo de ruído, 66,7% (n=12) também eram bruxistas. Foi observada associação estatisticamente significante entre a presença de ruído e bruxismo. Ao analisar a associação entre ruído e as variáveis gênero e idade, o grupo estudado não houve associação entre ruído e gênero, porém em relação à idade, houve uma maior porcentagem de crianças sem a presença de ruído articular aos 6 anos de idade, sendo estatisticamente significante. CONCLUSÃO: os dados do presente estudo mostraram associação entre bruxismo e ruídos articulares em crianças. .

PURPOSE: the aim of the present study was to determine whether bruxism is associated with joint sounds in children. METHODS: children aged six to nine years were recruited from the pediatric clinic of the School of Dentistry of University Nove de Julho (Brazil). Twenty-one children with bruxism and 27 children without this condition (control group) were selected. The evaluation was performed by a previously trained examiner who was blinded to the allocation of the groups and involved manual palpation as well as lateral and dorsal extra-auricular auscultation of the temporomandibular joints with the aid of a stethoscope for the determination of joint sounds, differentiating a click/pop from crepitus. At least three readings were performed on each child. Descriptive statistics were conducted and the chi-square test was used to test associations among the variables, with the level of significance set to 5% (p < 0.05). RESULTS: a total of 37.5% (n = 18) of the sample exhibited some type of joint sound. Among these children, 72.2% (n = 13) exhibited a click/pop and 27.8% (n = 5) exhibited crepitus. Among the 18 children with joint sounds, 66.7% (n = 12) also had bruxism. A statistically significant association was found between joint sounds and bruxism. No association was found between joints sounds and sex. However, a significant association was found with regard to age, as a greater percentage of children at six years of age had no joint sounds. CONCLUSION: the present findings demonstrate an association between bruxism and joint sounds in children. .